![]() ![]() Since Compton’s arrest, Ohio police departments have used similar data in two homicide investigations. ![]() The Compton case may be one of the first internet of things prosecutions, but it’s far from the last. But for people who are worried, rationally or irrationally, about being monitored, the reasonable solution certainly cannot be: If you want to maintain privacy interests, avoid pacemakers and activity trackers. In an era where consumers constantly reveal intimate information, perhaps privacy is a losing battle. The law hasn’t yet caught up with a world of endless data. This technology presents a new frontier for criminal litigation and law enforcement. All of it can be used as incriminating evidence. Smart cars may record our speed, distance traveled, and location homes can tell what rooms are occupied and other smart appliances may track our daily routines. Athletic classes display participants’ real-time performance data on public scoreboards, and online fitness groups stay motivated by sharing personal data with other members.Įach day we leave revealing data trails, and prosecutors are realizing how valuable these can be in solving crimes. They already walk around wearing athletic trackers that monitor heart rate, distances ran, hours slept, and calories burned, for instance. There’s nothing new about consumers choosing to bring tracking and recording devices into their homes. If Compton didn’t want doctors and law enforcement to have access to his heartbeat, what alternative did he have - decide against getting a pacemaker?” “For people worried about being monitored in that way, this ruling is chilling. “The reality is that we are no longer the sole proprietors or controllers of our personal information,” says Stephanie Lacambra, the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s criminal defense staff attorney. The more connected, convenient, and smart our devices are, the more they have the potential to expose the truth. They said statements Compton gave to fire officials at the scene differed from the story he later told investigators in addition, investigators reported Compton's property smelled of gasoline and that his account was inconsistent with the available evidence. ![]() Ohio authorities determined that the fire originated from multiple locations within the house, leading them to conclude that a crime had occurred. Before escaping, Compton managed to pack his belongings in multiple bags, grab his computer and medical device charger, break through a window with his cane, and throw his luggage out of it. In September 2016, Compton told law enforcement, he awoke to find his home on fire he survived, but the blaze caused $400,000 of damage and killed his cat. Her nonfiction work has been published by Rolling Stone and The Marshall Project. This fall she will begin attending Columbia University’s graduate school of journalism. Deanna Paul ( is a former New York City prosecutor and adjunct professor of trial advocacy at Fordham University school of law. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |